We have been thinking quite a bit about, you know, how all the newspapers are saying we’re all going to be poor, and quite soon, and then, in particular, how this affects the appetite for $200 jeans. (We are trying to find the NY Times piece quoting this guy who was all, ‘And some people will now have to adjust to life with $100 jeans.’ He was hysterical, though we are not sure if he was hysterical on purpose or not.)
Anyway: We happened to be working at a "luxury" magazine (read: $10,000 "seating units") when the whole "masstige" thing hit (mixing Hanes tees and Chanel jackets, Stella McCartney for H&M, etc) and it was weird: especially the way, for the audience of our magazine, everything had to get even more insane and blingier because (horrors!) the poor (read: middle class) could get a piece of Stella McCartney, even if they had to do it at H&M. At the same time, though, we own a pair of $200 jeans. (Just one. And we regret it. All our best denim comes from Topshop and cost around $80, and even that’s inflated thanks to our Monopoly-ish currency abroad.) Anyway, if there is a recession, there’ll be fewer advertising pages in magazines, and fewer stories to face those pages, and we’ll probably go back to fighting for babysitting jobs. But as far as this affects our appetite for $200 jeans: We don’t think we’d mind if they went away. We feature them here, all the time, because sometimes you need a pair of jeans you can wear to your office. God knows if we were planning on having an office job for longer than the next two weeks, we’d invest, and our boss would maybe stop saying things about how "bohemian"-ly we dress.
All we know is that we have another job interview on Thursday, and we have nothing to wear, but we do have a sewing machine, and we’re going to make ourselves a dress, all Project Runway-style. And we know fuck-all about economics, but we do know that saving is a good thing, and while we will defend, to our death, our endorsement, and occasional purchasing, of $200 jeans, we’re going to be as smart about it as possible. Which, in any case, was the whole point of this blog: the realization that sometimes we would either (a) want to buy something really beautiful or (b) need to buy something really smart, and that it would be nice to talk about those things sometimes.
Long story short: We’re tightening the belt around here. We’re still going to talk about $200 jeans, because if, say, we get that job on Thursday, we’re going to need them. But we also want to say that what we’re going to be thinking very hard about what we need, and what we don’t, and the difference between the two.
Did we mention we’re getting over the flu? Because this is the longest preamble we’ve ever made use of to say:
$33 jeans from Cheap Monday (above), hurrah! And now a few more items from the Active Endeavors sale:
Someone we know, who is not a girl, had a sweater at our apartment lately, and we kept hoping, as we hung it on a hanger and hid it on our clothing rack between various heavy coats of ours, that he would forget it here. He did not. Sometimes what you really need are the basics. Joie sweater, was $175, now $88
Lily McNeal makes the nicest sweaters, we swear. Lily McNeal wool sweater, was $207, now $104
And we are so excited to wear this next summer. Or with lots of tights and cardigans. Zooey dress, was $207, now $104
By the way, this is a small, small sampling of their massive sale: See the other 1400+ items here.



























