web analytics

200901230024.jpg

There are three amazing fashion-oriented photo exhibitions at ICP. Like: above! This is Juergen Teller, obvs, from Weird Beauty: Fashion Photography Now. It is weird! We love it. He makes us think Marc Jacobs is a genius.

200901230026.jpg

This is not so contemporary. What a strange, strange picture, no? Tree! Parasols! Bizarreness. Anyway, it’s from: Edward Steichen in High Fashion: The Conde Nast Years.

200901230029.jpg

And finally: This, by Stephen Shore, is from This Is Not a Fashion Photograph. We can’t believe people ever looked like that, collectively. We have never been to a party like this.

200901221314.jpg

We admit it: We’ve converted. We were very skeptical before. We don’t like invite-only things, online or elsewhere, because life is too short for hassle. But! How can we fight against $1000 off Temperley at the Gilt final sale? And there’s loads (and loads) of stuff under $40. If you need an invite, email us at thumper at bunnyshop dot org, please.

Abobe: Amina dress, was $1195, now $228

It's true – many things we do, we've done so because your regularly scheduled writer has told us to do so. She often knows better, and knows trends well ahead of their time (need we mention the time she tried explain YouTube and we did not understand what Bono had to do with videos?)  We basically copy, oh, everything she does – including her latest venture into Twitter. Our Twitter (twittering? tweets? posts?) will be far less glamorous – we aren't headed to Sundance any time soon – but we will let you know when we find a great deal on something we actually want to buy or a record we can't get out of our heads.

Follow us! www.twitter.com/lilbunnyshop. We're getting the hang of it, slowly but surely!

-LB

200901200154.jpg

Firstly: Yay Inauguration! Secondly: For some reason we’ve been talking about buying art all week, and we think the best place to do this, rather than, say, the mall, is 20X200, because they put up something new every Tuesday and Wednesday at 2 p.m. We always forget—maybe because we are in such a rush to get back in time for Dr. Phil—but we hope we will not today. The idea: three sizes of each piece, ranging in price from $20 to $2000. $20! We don’t think of ourselves as being able to afford art, but we can definitely afford $20 to make everything in our apartment look all nice and grown-up-like. Remember: 2 p.m. the next one is available! If we can remember the Hautelook Lauren Conrad sale today (11 a.m. ET, to be precise; as always, email us if you’re like an invite at thumper at bunnyshop dot org), we can remember this.

01.19.2009

We love magazines. This admission comes as no surprise to anyone who knows us well. We actually managed to crack a brick wall in an old apartment – we had a shelf above our couch to keep our magazines out from under foot. From time to time, we’d throw out the old, add new.

Well, lo and behold, one day, we looked up – and there was a foot long crack, spidering out from the shelf. The weight of our magazines had cracked the brick, the drywall, and the plaster on our walls. We promptly took them down, spackled it up and moved. We did not move the magazines with us.

We rarely throw out back issues – who knows when you might need to reference something? And some magazines cost so much that you may as well throw a $10 bill down the drain (British Vogue,  we’re looking at you here). We’ve tried to cut down on how many we get a month, subscriptions have lapsed, but we still get giddy when we get new ones.

A family member told us today about maghound.com; telling us, ‘It’s like Netflix for magazines’. We checked it out immediately, and then became confused. Do we have to return them at the end of the month? How can we possibly have all these magazines for $5 a month? It seems too good to be true. We called family member back, and as soon as she stopped laughing at us, she assured they magazines are yours to keep! Amazing! Or, we’re just really dumb. Either way.

Here’s the deal. For a set price a month, you get a set number of magazines a month. For $5, you get 3 titles, for $7 you get 5, and so on. You’re not locked into a year subscription – so you can hop from title to title as you wish. And, you get to keep them. For your basic fashion titles, this doesn’t make sense – you can get Marie Claire for $8 a year. But for more expensive titles, like Real Simple, Martha Stewart Living, Dwell, etc – it ends up being a pretty decent deal.

We’re starting with Popular Photography, Real Simple, Saveur, NY Magazine and Outside – we’ll report back after we get our first issue(s). It’s amazing!

If anyone else decides to give it a shot, let us know what you get! We love to know what others are reading!

-LB

200901180325.jpg

We thought, given the subject matter, that it would be reasonable to break into our normal coverage for our first-ever Sundance review on this site: “The September Issue,” or, as we suggested to our Sundance roommate when we left the screening room, “The Devil Bares Nada.” (Ba-dum-dum!) It is the story of the making of Vogue’s titular September 2007 issue (the biggest-ever issue of a single-month consumer magazine, etc etc) and how Anna Wintour actually is mean in real life like she was in the Anne Hathaway movie.

Meaner: She does, in fact, actually tell one person (the innocent cameraman, drafted into service during a shoot) he’s too fat and that he should go to the gym. Also, Sienna Miller’s hair is “lackluster” and her toothy smile not up to Vogue standards. (“And I think these are fillings?”) AW basically comes across as a repressed control freak whose overachieving family (including lawyer-to-be daughter Bee) thinks she’s useless. The entire process would be heartbreaking if it weren’t so often ridiculous, like when ALT shows up to play tennis with Louis Vuitton luggage in tow, or when stylist\model\editor Grace Coddington (easily the film’s most likable presence) makes her salad the object of her displaced rage after some of her images are cut, murdering leafy greens with a heretofore-unseen lettuce-murdering vigor.

200901180318.jpg

It’s a great documentary, in sense that you’re constantly like, How did they get that access? We have no idea why Wintour would be up for this, and the timing seems particularly bad, given the rumors that she’ll soon be pushed out for Carine or sent to France on an ambassadorship. It’s a little TMI, like when Wintour shows some total Roger Federer mentionitis. (“Did you see Roger won?”) The access is amazing: Karl Lagerfeld, Mario Testino, Oscar de la Renta, Stefano Pilati, Vera Wang, Jean Paul Gaultier, and Thakoon all make appearances.

We didn’t leave the screening understanding why AW went through all the hassle of being an editor, beyond her story about her father telling her to declare her interest in being the editor of Vogue when faced with filling out a questionnaire about her future. But for anyone who loves looking at pretty things, and is curious about the way the magazine comes together—and NB we work at a magazine, and we’re still curious about it—we really wouldn’t miss it.

200901161349.jpg

OUCH HOT!

200901161348.jpg

And we just hate this. :(

200901161352.jpg

Last year’s Kirsten Dunst was so much nicer!

IMG_0926.JPG

So! After all the discussion of the Sephora return policy, we decided to test it ourselves. We’ve been doing a fairly massive pre-pre-pre-spring clean and since we only got halfway through it before leaving for Sundance (which we’re twittering!), it is quite terrifying to observe the current state of our apartment. (Looks like: frat house at dissolute university.) Anyhoo, we ransacked our medicine cabinet and two plastic bags of random makeup and beauty products for anything we bought (or, er, could have bought) at Sephora. First, we noticed that a lot of what we have needs to be thrown away because it is lame hotel giveaways that we hate. Second, we have a lot of Kiehl’s. Third: hurrah! Plenty of stuff to return. All things we should have returned ages ago but spaced on.

Our first effort: at the Short Hills Mall in NJ. (We couldn’t deal with taking them back in NYC, though now we think that it might even have been less stressful since they’re just busy and have less time to snark.) We returned almost-full bottles of Peter Thomas Roth sunscreen (“it made us breakout”) and Philosophy Hope Is Not Enough (“it just didn’t work.”) We did bring the item numbers, but couldn’t tell if they made us look helpful or like professional returners. The salesgirl asked us if the HINE was part of a set—we said no, and then that we couldn’t remember. (All true.) She gave us credit for both. We bought a Black Honey Clinique lip gloss and a replacement Fibrewig (the best mascara ever created.) Net result: gift card, about $20.

Our second effort! The Bridgewater Commons Mall, also in NJ. Here we took back a high-ticket item (that we cannot name since it was a gift) and something we forget—anyway, for $120! All of gift card. Moving forward, our personal rules:

1: No more than two products at a time

2: No need to concoct fancy excuses

3: Er, refer back to #1. It’s pretty straightforward. We did write down the product numbers from the website—which we think helped the process but also might have made us look a bit too fluent in the whole process. Not sure if we’d do that again.

4. And we definitely wouldn’t take back individual items from gift sets, or anything that wasn’t compelling pretty close to full

Yay, Sephora! They own us lock, stock now. In that vein, we’d love any similar stories of people and their favorite brands….

200901150132.jpg

Oh no! This is so wrong. Now, we love Blake Lively, we even interviewed her once, pre-Gossip Girl, and she was totally adorable and sweet and told us all about her career in student government. But for every BL cover there should be a Leighton Meester cover! Because that is the only time things are balanced in the universe. We let it go when W had their BL cover, but Vogue goes too far. We’re biased, but only Nylon did it right, with their double covers. (There is, weirdly, a bizarrely negative article about this at Fox News.com of all places, but we’re not linking to them because that’s practically like linking to the Ann Coulter website: “Yes, it might seem a bit extreme, but not to several insiders, who are whispering that the choice to feature “Gossip Girl” star Blake Lively on the February cover of Vogue magazine is a testament to the magazine’s creative and advertising woes.” Weird, right?)

We just don’t like it when the show gets all meta, and Blair \ LM is overshadowed by the billion-watt blondness of BL \ Serena. Because LM is amazing and Blair is one of the best villian…esses? on TV ever. There is something unpleasantly … Gossip Girl-ish about BL getting the Vogue cover—and LM getting Teen Vogue.

Finally, we have written “Blair Lively” about 1000X in this post. On to the episode!

Picture 1.png

We love Blair’s purple coat but they dress her like such a little investment banker some time it completely freaks us out. She’s 17!

Picture 2.png

Also heart Serena’s coat (as well as Eric’s, which we mentioned last week – yay continuity!). Also her mega-sized bag, though it made us a bit weary of carrying it.

Picture 4.png

Another look at the purple coat!

Picture 5.png

We continue to be obsessed with how they coordinated the Plastics. Bows and v-necks!

Picture 7.png

And plaids!

Picture 10.png

And Jackie-Faux! (We just came up with that.)

Picture 6.png

Lily + Rufus kind of made us barf this week, but we love that neckline.

Picture 8.png

And honestly: This is just more Maxim to us than Audrey Hepburn. We’re not entirely understanding this dress.

01.14.2009

The other day we made the world’s most amazing salad (recipe below; pls keep in mind that when we say we can’t make toast, we burned it last time). It was so amazing we called our friend Katie to tell her this. In our opinion, Twitter is the salad-communication-medium of the 2.0 web. Which is probably very 1.0 of us. Maybe President Obama (!!!!!!!!!!!!) will Twitter big announcements. In any case, we’re part of the Twitter-Sundance pack, so “follow” us if you have any interest in our time in Park City, which apparently have started (really) with us leaving our suitcase (and all our clothes) in our parents’ driveway. Oops!

Our user name is bunnyshop, predictably. Last year we saw Paris Hilton. We promise no such fascinating nuggets in ’09.

Salad!

“Spring mix”

Dried cranberries and apricots

Balsamic vinaigrette

Goat cheese.

Just like the one in Dean and Deluca but not $8!