web analytics

In today’s Reader Mail:

Dear BS:

I noticed you’ve been writing a lot about jobs lately. I have a job interview coming up—I have no money and I need something to wear, immediately! I don’t need specific suggestions—I don’t have time for delivery—but if you had any ideas about how to start thinking about this, I’d love to know. I want the job!

Love,
S.H.

Well! We actually have an interview ourselves tomorrow, since our Fashion Week job only lasts through Fashion Week. (Appropriately enough.) And we are in a similar boat, since so much of our wardrobe continues to consist of things made of denim. Today we went to Forever 21 to find something to wear, because as much as we’d like to get the job, it is a temporary position, and therefore not worth spending a load of money on. And we realized this: When we go into a store, all, We need a new outfit! we get very overwhelmed, and quite a bit cranky, and we try on five million things that just make our hair staticky and we leave and spend our money
on cupcakes. We have devised what we think is a much more sensible strategy:

1: We are going to focus on one thing in our ramshackle wardrobe we are definitely going to wear. It is either going to be our patent black shoes from Topshop or a vintage dress.

2: And then we are going to spend as little as possible, on as few garments as possible, working from there. Because what we really want to spend our money on is sequin hotpants.

Maybe this isn’t going to make a load of difference to anyone else out there—it is, after all, the most basic sort of common sense. Common sense isn’t something we have much of, unfortunately, so it ranks as big news to us.

There was a moment when we realized that in our industry it’s perfectly acceptable to interview in jeans, and this became our favorite outfit ever. Especially: 18th Amendment Colberts, $218, and Dita sunglasses, $225


We are so psyched about music in the afternoon. We love Battles, and we love the live version of this song even more than we do the one on album. It’s Atlas by Battles on Later With Jools Holland.

Picture_9In today’s reader-submitted Bunnyshop Hearts!

i heart beautiful bags: http://www.mattandnat.com/

and the best part –> they are vegan and cruelty-free! i’m saving up to get one (i’ve been eyeing the ‘kravitz’ in earth/dark brown for a while now).

All best,
J.

We almost literally shed tears of joy when people send us things they love: partly because it expands, you know, our horizons, and partly because it means less working for us. Though, remarkably, it is more the former than the latter. Share yours here and earn our ever-lasting devotion.

The Johnny, $140

We had the loveliest hat that we bought in Finland last year, on the way to Mongolia. Tragically, this hat was the only thing that kept us from throwing up all over our neighbor on the plane last week, and so now we have no hat. It has made us very nostalgic for Finnish things in general.

Above: That seems to us like a lot of rug for $99. That’s like IKEA-style pricing. Marimekko Kivet rug, $99

This above is a Marimekko fabric. We have no idea what we would do with it. But we could come up with something. "Moments" fabric, sold by the repeat, $111.30

So apparently this is going to be more about Marimekko than we might have thought. Anyway. There are few books we are as excited about as the ones that make up our (very small) design library. This would be a very good one, we think, to add to it. Marimekko, $60



So yesterday was  apparently the day of beauty reviews! We spend far more time reading product reviews than we should – and we’ve learned that sometimes, it’s just complete garbage. We haven’t actually LEARNED anything USEFUL yet, which as one can imagine, is really annoying. We’ve seriously been to the Kiehl’s counter 6 times in a month, and returned probably 10 products that we read were good. Jerks.

Here is where our potential new plan comes in. We are not experts, we fully admit this. And everyone can have different experiences.  But would it be interesting for us to review products suggested by you, our awesome readers? We’d have to be kind of selective – like we can’t afford to go out and buy a tub of La Mer or whatever the fuck, just to see if it makes our skin feel nice. And we definitely wouldn’t try anything dangerous, like LipoDissolve (as Lovely Friend so desperately wants, and we keep telling him absolutely not). But we’re game to be your guinea pig, if it’d help. Plus, while we are far from scientific, 3 of the 4 people in our immediate family work in science, so we could try to help determine why something works (or doesn’t). We can’t be sure they want to be involved, but you never know.

What do you guys think about this? Yes? No? Should we just stick with randomly buying things and writing about it?

Above, Kiehl’s Creamy Eye Treatment ($24) – the one new product we’ve actually really liked, reviews be damned.

-LB

IndexWe just wrote this whole post about a coat that we finally decided was so boring that we couldn’t bear to put it up. (For the record, it was this DKNY cashmere trench, was $400, now $99.99.)

We like this better. This is totally basic and super boring but in the right way—like, the conservative, not-showing-things-off-that-shouldn’t-be-shown-off-at-work way. (It’s cuter than the picture, btw.) So we can occasionally, where necessary, be employed at our discretion, and not embarrass people in front of their employers, as well. Net-a-Porter’s final-reduction sale is, as they say, off the hook, so if you’re looking for a dress, we couldn’t recommend it more highly.

12th St X Cynthia Vincent dress, was $200, now $120

Cd_11617129_h_puSo our book-a-week project (inspired by Jen Miller’s much more successful one here) is off to a slow start, given that it’s taken us two weeks to slog through Out of Africa—though slog suggests, incorrectly, that we don’t like it, which would be a terrible lie. In fact, when we were in Utah last weekend, our friend was all disgusting and throwing up (this is about 24 hours before we were, ourselves, all disgusting and throwing up) and we read him this bit here:

Denys Finch Hatton and I went with Mr. Bulpett for a picnic to the top of Ngong Hills on his seventy-seventh birthday. As we sat up there we came to discuss the question of whether, if we were offered a pair of real wings, which could never be laid off, we would accept or decline the offer.

Old Mr. Bulpett sat and looked out over the tremendous big country below us, the green land of Ngong, and the Rift Valley to the west, as if ready to fly off over it at any moment. "I would accept," he said, "I would certainly accept. There is nothing I should like better." After a little time of thought he added: "I suppose that I should think it over, though, if I were a lady."

We would argue that ladies would enjoy wings most of all, but still: We just think that is so lovely. It was difficult, sometimes, to reconcile her views of her African neighbors—she is quite European about that, and of her time, though, we imagine, better than most. We focus on the prose, which is, as we said, just unbelievably lovely.

But moving on to matters we have a degree of control over: We are next reading Seneca’s On the Shortness of Life: Life Is Long If You Know How to Use It, part of the Penguin Books Great Ideas series.

Now that we are working in Manhattan again—officially in fashion, no less—we are thinking quite a bit about greedy, rapacious, plastic people. (Not to be too negative about it.) To speak specifically, we have been living, the past few years, as a freelance magazine writer, which pays rubbish but gives us much spare time to sit and be anxious about where our next paycheck is coming from—but spare time, we suppose, is spare time, and quite a good thing. Then we were all, let’s drive to Mongolia! And not work for two months. (Ergo, our current office paying-off-bills position.) Anyway, we miss our spare time, which we would, we hope, be filling with art projects and meaningful things (rather than watching "truTV".) Anyway, we have been thinking quite a bit about spare time, and just read this:

You will hear many people saying: "When I am fifty, I shall retire into leisure; when I am sixty I shall give up public duties." And what guarantee do you have of a longer life? Who will allow your course to proceed as you arrange it? Aren’t you ashamed to keep for yourself just the remnants of your life, and to devote to wisdom [BS addition: and crafts projects] only that time which cannot be spent on any business? How late it is to begin really to live just when life must end!

All we know is, we’re paying off our bills, and getting back to our life of craft-filled subsistence, stat. We’ll tell you this: our boss has a $1700 handbag, and if it fell in our lap, we’d keep it. (Long enough to sell it on eBay.) But as far as working 80-hour weeks to support that handbag: We do not envy her, one bit.

Above: Dior handbag, $1755

And: Out of Africa, $10.17, and On the Shortness of Life, $8.95


This song is exactly what a late Monday afternoon requires.

What a clever idea! Especially if you are buying someone, someone you are dating or not dating, a lovely present in a few weeks. Like, "Our Favorite Postman" or "Best Dentist Ever." Etc. Custom silver bracelets,
$60

"Coco Chanel, Coco shell": It is awesome watching Karl Lagerfeld think.

But anyway: Look how sleek those jackets look!