web analytics

So that necklace, which we really quite like, is by Ann Marie Lawson. We cannot find AML’s website, so we are forced to say only that if you live in San Francisco, preferably somewhere near 16th Street, you can find many more examples of her lovely, lovely work at the super-lovely Candy Store, which is really one of the few SF boutiques we can sufficiently motivate ourselves to get to. (NB that the bag in this picture is, indeed, La Voleuse’s Thursday bag.) In any case, we were frustrated by the lack of web access to her things, so we thought we would put together this little mini-travaganza of independent jewelry designers, who are, of course, our favorite kind of jewelry designers. (Bad, bad corporate jewelry designers! Except when we only have $4! In which case we love those of you who work for H&M and make $4 earrings!)

Anyway: Here is some of our recent favorites:

More independent jewelry designers:
Knot Studio
Alisha Louise
My Sunset Road
Ronni Kappos
Early Jewelry
Maya Brenner Designs

We don’t love the white tights, but we do love this dress. All elegant-like! Bi La Li dress, was $320, now $224

Okay, so while we don’t hate the new Claire Danes \ Patrick Wilson Gap commercials as much as we did the travesty that was the Audrey Hepburn series, we can’t help it: Whenever we see Claire Danes, we think: homewrecker, homewrecker, homewrecker. (Whenever we see Billy Crudup we are more like, “Could we not have Jim Caviezel instead?” We are hoping this is not because of deeply-imbedded gender issues but because we cannot remember the last time Claire Danes actually appeared in anything outside of Us Weekly.) We remain: Team Mary-Louise!

Anyhow. We are even less enthusiastic about the boyfriend trouser, such as it is. First of all, we are not sure we want a boyfriend who is quite so enthusiastic about his khakis. Second of all—we were talking about this with a British friend, about how the British (these are his words) believe in some of its institutions—both private and public for the sake of argument—and their obligation to deliver to many people (the BBC, M&S, etc.) (He was less enthusiastic about the NHS.) Anyway: Our position was that we don’t have as many of these in the U.S., but, we said, we have always wanted the Gap to provide the nation with affordable, reasonably-not-ugly clothing. And in our opinion, they have lately been failing us.

Witness:

The “Boyfriend Trouser,” $49.50

We will say, however, we are actually rather surprised by the fact that we sort of like the looks of this dress, though the weird empire seam could be troublesome. Big dot empire dress, $69.50

Oh, good God. So here is the situation: We pay two very important bills in the middle of the month. One goes to American Express, and one goes to New York state. This month, because we were being sooooo smart, we paid both of these bills out of our Commerce Bank account, which is the one we use at home, rather than our BofA account, which is the one we are horribly forced to use at school, in California, where there are, tragically, no Commerce Banks. (We swear this will get at least marginally more interesting in seconds.)

Anyway: We paid them both out of our Commerce account, which, unfortunately, had only enough money in it to pay one of them. We checked our bank balance, as we will, and discovered our account was negative $100, which meant that not one but both of our super-important payments were going to bounce, and we were going to jump out a window. We called Commerce. They told us that rather than fucking us and sending back both payments PLUS charging us fees on each transaction (fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, Bank of America), we had until the end of the day to make up the difference, which we did. (Er, which our mom did. Thanks, Mom!)

Commerce is also: open seven days a week. You can walk into Commerce, and they’ll give you a replacement ATM card right away. Or a treat for your dog. For foreign transactions, BofA charges you a $5 surcharge, and Commerce does not. Oh! And right, the big one, Commerce will pretty much make the funds from any check available over night, while BofA makes you wait five days.

Okay, so that is super random, and we are really not so into recommending giant things like banks, or supermarkets, or car manufacturers. We prefer independent jewelry designers. But as far as making our life better, oh! It is the world’s best bank! And we recommend it so totally to everyone.

From the comments section regarding an earlier post on our new favorite look, which is mini-skirts and tights and loose tops:

I hate my thighs.

Booo! to mini skirts.

Now this is something we feel quite strongly about. We have what we believe to be the rather unique status of having been informed, in the national media, that we must never wear mini-skirts, and must, instead, wear palazzo pants. We have mentioned this previously, and it is obviously one of those things we are just never going to get over: We remember when our good friend at the New York Post offered us a chance to get made-over by the What Not to Wear girls, and we were like, fuck yeah! Partly we wanted the free clothes, but mostly we wanted to be restyled. We did not get restyled. (We didn’t get any free clothes, either, but that bitterness we can live with.) We were shoved into a pair of palazzo pants, and then they patted the tops of our thighs and were all, like, “You’re big through here.” “But,” we said, if not aloud. “We’re recovering from a knee injury! We can’t run! These are not our usual thighs!” There was no room for discussion: There was only the fact that we must never, again, horrify the world with our thighs.

We cried, right there in Bloomingdales. Not because we’d just heard we were too fat for skirts—well, partly that, but mostly because there seemed to be no room for improvement. We found the whole thing anti-American, “American” in the sense of anything-being-possible, of working hard and making the grade. (Which is separate, we would like to point out, from puking up your lunch.) For the next few years, we, in fact, did not wear many skirts. And then our knee healed, and we started training for our next marathon, and we found ourselves wearing our favorite American Apparel shorts everywhere we went, and we found that small children and puppies did not combust immediately upon seeing our knees. Eventually, we shared this philosophy with skirts. And while we occasionally get a little PTSD about it and call someone we are related to asking if it is okay if we wear skirts, we are mostly over it.

So here is where this whole thing loops around: We are currently in the body-form we like to call “winter layering”—fatter than usual, all the better for warding off Arctic cold and similar. (Which you can imagine we get a lot of in California. But anyway.) We are not, in any case, at our summer weight, though by the grace of ashtanga yoga classes we hope to be soon. Anyway, we were walking down the street, in our shorts, thinking: Are we too fat to wear these? And we were calculating the amount of time it will take us to get to our summer weight (summer), and we were thinking that this was sort of a shame, because summer is quite a while from now. And then we just happened to look in some random mirror, and we were like: What if we were just like, Who cares? Surely we’re just fine. Fine! And then we were like: What if we decided that however we are now, rather than in the summer, or whenever, is completely fine? And skirt-permitting?

Weight has just got to be one of the most fucked-up cultural issues in this country, we’re sure. Not fucked up like the state of education, we’re thinking, but fucked up all the same, and we’re thinking that it’s one of those things where the more you freaking think about it, the more it fucks you up. We believe in mini-skirts, and shorts, and upper-arm-baring-tank tops, in all sorts of bodies. This is not to say we endorse bingeing on nasty, bad-for-us foods, and don’t get us started on these negative-sized starlets and the fucked, pathetic, limiting, idiotic view of the ideal female shape as suggested by much of our culture—entertainment-wise, advertising-wise, fashion-runway-wise, etc. This has got to be one of those things that are so hard to find a happy medium. But we’re convinced that people are happiest when they’re not covering themselves up in unflattering clothing. We still remember the day when we bought our first fitted t-shirt, which is sort of like saying we remember the day we first used the Internet. (Which we do.) And we know that when we go outside in our mini-dress, maybe we are heavier than, say, Lindsay Lohan. We have the trouble of not doing coke. And you know what, we just don’t care. Because we love them, and we think everyone should love what they wear, and not shame themselves into khakis (even their “boyfriend’s trousers” etc) because they haven’t dropped those last five pounds yet. This is the secret: When you wear what you love, and you don’t give it a shit, you generally look excellent. (Best example: Beth Ditto.) We’re not exactly outing ourselves as fans of otherwise-normal women in half-shirts and pleated minis; we’re certainly not saying to embrace the inner tart. We’re thinking the bigger problem—precisely because it is so invisible—is when we sort of give up, and say: We’re fat, so we will wear baggy jeans, and men’s t-shirts, and we will feel badly about ourselves, all because we don’t do so many drugs that we actually have an appetite. Fuck that, and fuck them.

We are totally buying this skirt. At top: Chip & Pepper mini, $132

And that is a fucking lot of dress for $150. Karen Zambos Vintage Couture mini dress, $150

Addendum, from the comments section:


i think its funny how most of you all agree with this post when most of you are probably size 4s or something and have only ever been called fat once or twice in your life. Do any of you know what its like to be called fat like almost everyday of your life? even by your family (who say their joking, but you know theyre not)yeah, you know what, you all go through that, and then tell me to have fucking confidence in myself!

This is clearly important enough for us to discuss outside of the comments area, and up here, in first class, such as it is. We happen to know first-hand what it was like to be the second-fattest girl in the class, seeing as how we didn’t begin to shed the baby fat til well after we were done being babies. We will say this: What happened, to be very boring and pedantic about it, was that we joined the rowing team our freshman year in college, and we spent all of our time not bundled up in big, cover-up-type clothes as would have been our preference, but in running shorts. And we realized our thighs were not quite as horrible as we had been led to believe. And we spent more time outside, unashamed of ourselves. And we exercised more, and we were less miserable \ anxious, so we ate less crap. That is what we are saying: We have absolutely no control over what other people think of us, if they think our boobs are a reasonable size or not, etc. Not to be too self-help-y about it, but we do have control over what we think of ourselves, and as soon as we found ourselves in a position where we weren’t constantly covering up our body, we stopped hating it—and just as importantly, we were happier outdoors, we were happier running around, and we were happier not bingeing on nachos and ice cream. We’re hardly going to suggest that anyone else out there in a similar position would experience anything similar—all we can report is what worked for us. For us, the running shorts and mini-skirts came first. We are just not going to live that life where you’re constantly waiting until we get to some mythical weight before we can wear clothes we like—because we will spend all that time in the endless interim obsessing over our food. A: Because it’s a waste of time. B: Because it would only make us eat more, and more crap.

And anyone who’s telling you you’re fat? Fuck them. We swear to freaking God, just look them in the eye and say: “Motherfucker, fuck off.”

Er, that’s what we’d say.

03.26.2007

Something about Kate Moss speaking makes all the hair on our arms stand up. We can’t explain it. It’s like when our dog makes this funny face, just before he’s about to start talking about how excited he is for the return of the Sopranos or something. We can’t explain it. So in honor of the debut of the Topshop video-pod-cast-ness with the new line which we do not think for one second we will be able to get our hands on, we submit vintage Kate from the Agent Provocateur video series. Honestly this video is so bizarre, and is most interesting for those who are like: Kate? Speaking? Really?

Speaking of, we are newly resolved to the idea of underwear not packaged in bundles of three. The Crista, $85

Okay, so this picture above is basically the worst example we could come with for a trapeze dress, seeing as how it is not actually a dress, but our favorite, of all the many we have lately seen, is from Zara, and Zara ridiculously refuses to put its trapeze dresses online. (This is the shirt version, but they have a dress just like it … but longer.)

We have always been a little meh on trapeze dresses, tending, as they will, to make it look like we have gone outside wearing a poncho, even when the poncho is silk, and in a very nice print. We are getting over it, though. Really: a belt. All it really demands is a belt, and very high shoes. So anyway: Our favorites are at Zara, but they’re too busy being Spanish to put them online. Ditto Mango.

There are no fewer than eight trapeze dresses available at Intermix, which strikes us proportionally as really quite a few. This is our favorite, probably because it comes the closest to looking like its 1970s ancestors, which is really the point after all, if we can’t find what we’re really looking for in vintage. Thread Social trapeze dress, $620

This dress strikes us as a way to do the trapeze thing without risking considerable volume-regret, which we define as that feeling of being too far away from home to go back and change while realizing you look like a pumpkin. WAYF trapeze dress, $352. We need to point out that none of these dresses are styled with a belt, so FYI we are obviously just channeling our volume-fear with the belt recommendation.

Continue reading »

We saw this walking out of Borders this weekend, and we were absolutey captivated by the latest HP promotional poster: Severus Snape! Friend! Or foe! Which is it! We demand to know! Oh WHY does July 21 have to be so very far away?

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, $18.89

In today’s Ask the Stylist:


I’m getting married this spring. Whee! Right. But I don’t want to buy a horrible wedding dress. It seems like it’d be a lot smarter to buy a regular designer dress, which will be beautiful and unbelievably not even much more money. I’m not looking for classic white either—it’s going to be warm where we are, so I’m looking for something super bright, that’ll pop—a special party dress. As for money, I’d like a range, please. What do you have?

Of course we had to have the stylist answer this one, since we have said so many times that we will marry not in … whatever it is that brides wear, but Balenciaga. We can honestly say it is the only part of the day that we really actually and truly look forward to. Anyway. To the stylist:

“I also think this is a really fabulous idea, and obviously one of the only ways you’d actually get multiple wears out of the dress—if that’s something you want to do. In any case, I’ve always loved seeing brides in non-traditional dresses like these—I suppose purists might be concerned that a friend or similar could one day wear the same dress to another event … but I say, who cares. I wouldn’t. If I marry I’ll marry in jeans, so that’s my perspective. But I think this is a great idea and I fully support it.”

“This is a beautiful dress and if you have the skin tone to color it off, it’ll be brilliant.” 3.1 .Phillip Lim dress, $815

“Pink and black is a crazy combination but a really unusual one, and it’s a real shortcut for something memorable.” Michael Kors silk dress, $1595

“This sort of pains me post-the insane Elizabeth Hurley Indian wedding extravaganza, but it’s beautiful and modern and sort of amazing. The brocade might be a little too heavy, texture-wise, if you’ll be out in the heat, however.” Michael Kors brocade dress, $1995

“This is really a little mermaid but also totally beautiful, and a great option if you want to go long.” Milly gown, $385

“If you’re looking for something light but not white, I love this Julie Haus dress. Simple and spare and so pretty.” Julie Haus Interview dress, $357

And so! That is what our stylist has to say about that. Do you have a question for our stylist? She has loads of time on her hands these days, and awaits your questions. Email us here.

The week is over. Long live spring!

And:

- Our favorite new look: mini-skirts, big tops, and thigh-proof tights.

- Quite possibly our favorite skin-care regimen ever.

- A public vote on the wisdom of the oversized sunglasses.

- The quickest of peeks at Madonna for H&M.

- Our favorite indie handbag in ages: the Viva Polonia from La Voleuse.

- Twenty percent off at week at LuLu’s Fashion Lounge with the discount code bunnyshop!

- And our favorite mid-range spring collection is….

P.S. It makes our day when the ads are clicked. Hurrah for ad-clicking!