web analytics

We are a little obsessed with SeenOn.com, and its abilities for helping us purchase the things we see on TV. Like these. We actually don’t remember seeing Meredith in these. We are betting that whatever episode it was, it was less annoying than that last one, which was annoying even if Sandra Oh was totally amazing and we are apparently in the very small minority of people who feel they are equally Team Izzy and Team Callie.

Anyway: Meredith’s Splendid sweatpants, $100

Personally, if we are buying anything from Splendid, we may prefer this v-neck top, regardless of whether Ellen Pompeo got to wear it on the show. Splendid v neck, $44

First: Yay Jennifer Hudson! That was cool, watching her win. And then the little waves she kept giving herself as she walked off-stage. That was awesome. The rest of it … whatever. It was sort of worth it for Jennifer Hudson. We’ve said it before: Somewhere out there, Justin Guarini feels newly emboldened. But really! It’s a message to us failures everywhere: You may have lost. You can get another chance. And win an Oscar! We love it. We would also like to thank God, for making JH remove her little silver jacket.

We also need to mention that we just realized we once made out with an Oscar nominee. Anything, we are thinking, is possible.

Well, well, well. Where do you start? Maybe this is our favorite. We can’t say. We’ve never been huge fans of big bangs and long, straight hair. But we’re speaking relatively, and at least we didn’t hate it, unlike….

This. This we totally hated, from doily dress to the bizarre butterfly bow. Tss.

And to us, it looks like Penelope Cruz is dressed for some sort of interpretive dance, in which she is channeling the spirit of a dancing, feathered pig. We’re just not into it.

Maybe it’s because that fashion week time of year. At least occasionally you see fashion there that looks like art. This just looks like fashion as commerce. We liked it better before Hollywood co-opted it. And why does Gwyneth Paltrow refuse to wear dresses that are properly supportive of her boobs? Why? Why?

We get that hot pink is a trend but … pass. We find ourselves bizarrely nostalgic for some 15-year-old Lithuanian models. Maybe it’s that those models, in some ways, really do look freakish, or weird, or wrong, and we’re so over hyper-rich Hollywood actresses who’ve had most of the quirks beaten out of them.

We love Maggie Gyllenhaal but this is not our favorite look of hers.

Ditto Cate Blanchett. We’ve loved her at every other awards show but we’re totally bored by this.

And Jada Pinkett Smith? Does anyone out there like this?

We will say this: We thought Cameron Diaz and her gravity-resistant hair looked horrible until she presented whatever she presented, and then we thought we actually sort of really liked that dress.

Kirsten Dunst. Whatever.

This is maybe just a really bad picture, because she had much more of a silver-foxy thing going on elsewhere.

Meryl Streep looks like one of our crazy art teachers, and we hate that necklace, but otherwise we think she looks gorgeous. But Nicole Kidman: that dress. Love the dress, but: that giant bow? We don’t get it. We know we are in the minority. We can live with that.

First: We are pretty sure we have emailed all of the individual contestants with news of the contest delay (if you entered and did not get a message, er, let us know): Our judge has resurfaced, and we will get the winner announced absolutely 100% as soon as possible. We are so sorry. It is Mercury retrograde. It is our only defense.

And the rest of the week:

- Guest stylist! What to wear, when exes attend the same parties as you do.

- DVF, Barbie style. Barf.

- Ashlee Simpson continues to make our head explode; however, we like her Lanvin shoes.

- Maya Brenner discount week! Twenty-five percent off! We return to our favorites.

- Prada socks? Er, thanks. But no thanks.

And above: our favorite outfit of the week. The shoes: Frye Anna flats, $140. The jeans (plus or minus): Earnest Sewn cigarette leg stretch jeans, $210

We have decided that Talla is our independent, non-annoying, non-Barbie-licious version of Diane Von Furstenberg. There’s just something we really like about this top, as long as it’s paired with something really narrow on the buttom, and maybe a sweet, cinch-y (dear God, how could we have thought of those words, in that sequence) belt. The point stands, even if the language fails us. Talla georgette top, $115

It’s the last day for the 25% Maya Brenner discount spectacular! And for our last piece: the jewelry box necklace. (“As seen on Penelope Cruz,” who we haven’t, but would like very much, to see in Volver.) Discount code = bunnyshop. We love being a discount code. Jewelry box necklace, $124, but with the discount $93! Oh, we love calculators almost as much as discount codes.

More independent jewelry designers:
Knot Studio
Alisha Louise
My Sunset Road
Ronni Kappos
Early Jewelry

We don’t get Gucci anymore. We felt like this whole show was very Cate Blanchett in The Aviator, but … well, we can’t afford the clothes. Sometimes we mind. This time we didn’t.

Oh, we hate those fucking tracksuits. And the prices aren’t great. But there are some things we really like from Juicy Couture. We really feel like that’s saying: “But there are some songs we really like by Ashlee Simpson.” Our mind boggles. We just saw this amazing movie about a women who blenderizes one lobster and electrocutes another, and we are so sad we haven’t thought of anything that clever yet. Maybe we’re just jealous because one of the Juicy girls got to marry John Taylor, and we didn’t. If we were 11, we’d hate her guts.

Anyway: Juicy. The more we think about it, the more we realize the one thing we like, at least that’s available online, is these jeans, because they defy our skinny jean tendencies and look, say, comfortable, which, one of these days, is going to be enough to make us wear them. But $178? Hmm. Hmm. JC boot cut jeans, $178

At the end of the day, though—and we need to admit that we are figuring this out as we type it—they do one thing well. Tracksuits. Fuck. We’re just so conflicted. Maybe we feel about this the way we do about a Marc Jacobs handbag: It’s like that itch that you resist scratching for so long—as far as JC is concerned, what is it now, four years?—and then one day you’re just like, ‘Oh, fine. Whatever.” We feel like we’re reporting from 2004. JC velour track jacket, $92

And we do need to say that we truly and without reservation love this trench. They do great outerwear. At least the fall collection had a lot of great outerwear. We’re much more meh on the few spring pieces we’ve seen. But this, we love, unreservedly. We just wish the model didn’t look quite so naked. JC trench, $350

The buttons on that jacket on the left just look mis-buttoned to us. No? But: take-away lesson from Moschino Cheap + Chic: terrifying bright tights are here to torment us at least through next season.

Since we’ve been talking so much about patent red peep-toes lately: These are seriously on sale, and cute enough, we’re thinking, for under $40. Steve Madden Lalos, were $121, now $36.30

02.22.2007

This is why we are so conflicted about Diane von Furstenberg. Barbie? Really? Tss. DVF Barbie, $100(!)

However: We love the spring collection so freaking much, we just wander around Bloomingdale’s touching it and annoying the sales staff.

We’re not sure where the model’s waist went on this one, but we look the pattern—we just think up-close it’s gorgeous. Damn you, Diane von Furstenberg! For confusing us so. Diane von Furstenberg Keane dress, $275